Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,701 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1159521- 1159530 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Sharo Bibi Vs Baldeo Das

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashI am of opinion the probate in this case does not prove the Will. In English law, probate is proper evidence of the executor''s title to personality. That depends on a peculiar law and state of things, w…

Mussamat Velaety Begum Vs Rugghonath Persad

Calcutta High Court Privy Council Appeal No. 853 of 1865

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe question is whether an appeal lies to Her Majesty in Council against an order of this Court passed in a case of execution of decree in which the amount involved exceeds Rs. 10,000 …

Luchmun Persad and Another Vs Raja Ram Tewary and Others

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeals Nos. 228, 240, 241, 249, 252 and 255 of 1865

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThis is a suit brought by Luchmun Persad, the son of Jeetun Lall, on account of himself, and as guardian of his minor brother Radhamohun Persad. The appeal is from a decision of the Pr…

In Re: Gobind Koomar Chowdhry

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Special Appeal No. 530 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Trevor, Kemp and Macpherson, JJ.@mdashWe think that in this case the Deputy Collector had power to enforce restitution of so much of the amount which was levied under the decree as it orig…

In Re: Brojender Coomar Roy

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that we must uphold the ruling of the fourteen Judges In Nobbo Kissen Singh v. Kaminee Dassee, ante, p. 349. Although it was a mere dictum of the Judges that the decision of t…

In Re: Jankee Bullub Sen

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Appeal No. 495 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that the Principal Sudder Ameen had power to do what he did. Whether he raised a right issue, with reference to the alleged adjustment or not, it is clear that he required the…

In Re: Khaja Shurwar Hossein Khan and Others

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Regular Appeal No. 710 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe two questions which have been propounded for the decision of the Full Bench are:--(reads). We are of opinion that both these questions must be answered in the affirmative. By the g…