Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,163,785 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1163171- 1163180 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Ewing and Co. Vs Gosaidas Ghose Two and Others

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashThere is one point, I think I must reserve for consideration. But it appears to me that Mr. Jackson has not brought his case within the provisions of section 119 of Act VIII of 1859. I think when that sec…

Mussamut Bibi Nasran Vs Syad Wali Alam

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Regular Appeal No. 178 of 1869

Kemp, J.@mdashIt appears in this case that certain disputes between the defendant, appellant and plaintiff, respondent, were referred to private arbitrators. The opposite party (Bibi Nasran) applied to the Court below, …

Kelly Vs Kelly and Saunders

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashIt is one of the rules of English evidence that evidence cannot be given to contradict irrelevant matter, and I think I ought not to treat cruelty or no cruelty as an issue between the petitioner and resp…

Syad Akram Ser and Others Vs Lalji Sing

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 563 of 1869

Glover, J.@mdashThis was a suit to recover a sum of rupees 713, arrears of rent for the year 1275. The defence was that all the rent had been paid, except rupees 84-12. The first Court gave plaintiff a modified decree f…

Kelly Vs Kelly and Saunders

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashI made the order in this case for the assessment of the probable amount of the wife''s costs and payment of the amount into Court, and directed that the wife''s proctor should have a lien for his costs on…

Bhuli Sing and Others Vs Mussamut Nehmubhu

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 701 of 1869

Glover, J.@mdashIn this matter I am compelled to differ with my brother Kemp, and with the learned Judges of other Division Benches. I need not say therefore that my opinion is come to with much diffidence. It appears t…

Graham and Co. Vs Kerr, Dods and Co.

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashIt is not enough to say that there was no fraudulent intention. That is no reason why an injunction should not be granted. I do not think I have any option if the marks, which defendants have used, are th…

The Queen Vs Bishonath Pal

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashThe prisoner has been convicted of dacoity by the verdict of a Jury and sentenced to transportation for life. There appears to have been a very serious irregularity in the mode of conducting the trial. T…

The Queen Vs Punaifattama and Another

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashThe prisoners have been convicted by the Judge of Purnea concurring with the Assessors, of the offences of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, of three persons, Jatru, Menghan and Jikri, and of ca…