Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,163,785 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1163331- 1163340 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Amani and Others Vs Mir Mahar Ali

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeals Nos. 59, 65, and 94 of 1868

Macpherson, J.@mdashMir Kazim Ali died, leaving a widow, Nasirun, and three daughters, Khyratun, Amani and Hakimun. The defendant, Mir Mahar Ali, was married to Hakimun, who is now dead. The suit, out of which these thr…

The Queen Vs Kabil Manji and Others

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashIn this case, Mr. Beaufort, the Judge of the 24-Pergunnahs, has sent up a conviction of three manjis, for having obstructed the line of navigation in the new canal, opposite Sura bazaa…

Srimati Krishna Sundari Dasi Vs Srinarayan Mitter

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2153 of 1868

Norman, J.@mdashWe see no necessity to go into the question, whether or not a Sudra can be adopted without the performance of religious ceremonies, namely the offering of burnt sacrifice, &c. The contention of the s…

Raja Akhaya Narayan Pal Vs Mohammed Hossein

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 581 of 1868

Markby, J.@mdashIn this case the plaintiff, having borrowed money from the defendant, gave his zamindari in farm to the defendant, who was to reimburse himself from the proceeds, paying to the plaintiff Rs. 300 a year a…

Ramsahaya Sing and Others Vs Syed Muzhar Ali and Others

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 1898 of 1868

Norman, J.@mdashWe are strongly inclined to think that this suit is not maintainable at all. The facts are, that in the year 1274 a batwara, or partition, of two estates paying revenue to the Government, called Ibrahimp…

Mah Wine and Aga Syud Abdul Hossein Vs Richard Snadden

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeal No. 48 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashIn treating the letter of Chow Rajapoot as a notice, and not as an agreement, I am taking the same view of it as the Court at Bangkok in the decision of His Royal Highneas Krom Kenaug …

The Queen Vs Ramgobind Chuckerbutty

Calcutta High Court

Norman, J.@mdashThis was a proceeding u/s 17 of Act IX of 1868, for penalties to which the defendant was alleged to be liable for not taking out a certificate and paying for the same within seven days after the service …