Found 0 result
Showing 1163371- 1163380 of 0 result for ""
Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashIt appears to us that the arbitrators were not authorized, by the terms of the submission, to take any other evidence than that of the widow as to whether or not the plaintiff was enti…
Loch, J.@mdashIn this case there appears to have been an application of the 13th February 1862 for execution of decree. It was struck off on the 31st January 1863. It also appears that there was another application of t…
Norman, J.@mdashWe have been prevented from going into the merits of this case by a preliminary objection taken by the respondent''s vakeel, that, u/s 27 of Act XXIII of 1861, no appeal lies, upon the ground that the su…
L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThis was a suit by Sonatan Roy and others, who occupied some parcels of land, to set aside a judgment of the Deputy Collector, by which they were ordered to execute a kabuliat in favour of the defe…
L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThis is an application on behalf of Pyari Mohan Mookerjee, for a precept or order of this Court, directing the Deputy Collector of Serampore to receive upon a stamp paper of the value of 8 annas, a…
Hobhouse, J.@mdashIn this case the plaintiff sues to recover khas possession of certain land. It was alleged that Mr. Mackenzie held these lands babundbust, i.e., without any agreement, up to the year 1271, when he died…
Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe are of opinion that the property of Parsu, deceased, cannot be taken in execution of a decree against Sriram, the surety.
Hobhouse, J.@mdashWe think that the Court below was quite right in this base. The decree-holder obtained a decree on the 16th April 1859. He made his first application to execute it on the 28th December 1861, and, in th…