Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,163,785 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1163461- 1163470 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

The Queen Vs Kazim Thakoor

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe question is, "when two Judges, sitting as a Division Bench of the High Court, in appeal, in a criminal case, are divided in opinion, is it necessary, with advertence to section 420…

The Queen Vs Srikant Charal

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe are of opinion that in the case of a prisoner''s pleading guilty before a Court of Session, the conviction upon that plea is valid, although there are no Assessors. See sections 362…

The Queen Vs Bhagai Dafadar

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe question is, whether the resistance of process of a Civil Court is punishable under the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction. It is unnecessary to dete…

Kalinath Roy Vs Iswar Chandra Ghosal

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 443 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe are of opinion that in this case the intervenor had no right to insist upon being made a defendant, and that the Court would have been wrong if it had made him a defendant. The case…

Beni Madhab Das Vs Ramjay Rokh

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 461 of 1868

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashIn my opinion, the judgment of the Court below cannot be sustained. It seems that the plaintiff (in common, it is alleged, with other members of the community) was accustomed to go across the defen…

Ambica Charan Nag Vs Mussamat Shibosundari Debi

Calcutta High Court

Jackson, J.@mdashIt appears tome that this special appeal is groundless. The plaintiff has shown that the decision of the Civil Court ban established his right to the land in question. It is not the meaning of section 7…

Buhal Sing Chowdhry Vs Behrilal

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 464 of 1868

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThis case appears to me so clear that, but for the contrary opinion of Mr. Justice Mitter from whom I am sorry to dissent, I should have no doubt upon it. Section 229 is the last of four sections o…

Prahlad Misser Vs Udit Narayan Sing

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2940 of 1867

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe appellants, the plaintiffs, purchased the land on the 28th of September 1864, under a decree of the 25th of March 1864. That decree was obtained on a mortgage bond dated the 7th No…