Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,163,785 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1163551- 1163560 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Radhika Prasad Chunder Vs Ramsundar Kur

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 3327 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashIt appears to us that the decision of the Judge ought to be affirmed. The Judge finds that the Collector at first allowed Kumar Narayan and Gajendra Narayan, the zemindars, to settle t…

Janali Vs Janali Chowdry

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Regular Appeal No. 156 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe decision of the Revenue Court has been set aside by the Revenue Court itself. It is contended, on the part of the plaintiff, that, as that decree has been set aside, there is no fo…

The Queen Vs Joseph Meriam

Calcutta High Court

Glover, J.@mdashWe see no reason to interfere with the finding of the Sessions Judge and Assessors in this case. The evidence clearly proves the prisoner''s guilt, and his appeal must be rejected. But the sentence appea…

Mahima Chandra Chuckerbutty Vs Rajkumar Chuckerbutty

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 40 of 1868

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe plaintiff sues four defendants with reference to five plots of land, and his prayer is to set aside a summary Thakbust award, to have a Thakbust map, which was amended in pursuance…

Lalbehari Dutt Vs Srinath Mookerjee and Others

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashIn this suit the plaintiff avers that he is the assignee of a decree, and that the defendant has seized and sought to sell this decree as being part of the assets of his assignor, and he sues to establish…

The Queen Vs Tajumaddi Lahory

Calcutta High Court

Phear, J.@mdashWe think that the first objection made by the Sessions Judge, in his reference, to the conviction of the Deputy Magistrate, is good. We think that the Deputy Magistrate had no jurisdiction to entertain an…

The Queen Vs Nagardi Paramanik

Calcutta High Court

Glover, J.@mdashIn this case one Nagardi Paramanik was charged with being a member of an unlawful assembly, and with criminal trespass, under sections 143 and 447 of the Penal Code, and whilst the case against him was p…