Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,163,785 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1163611- 1163620 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

In Re: Brojender Coomar Roy

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that we must uphold the ruling of the fourteen Judges In Nobbo Kissen Singh v. Kaminee Dassee, ante, p. 349. Although it was a mere dictum of the Judges that the decision of t…

In Re: Jankee Bullub Sen

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Appeal No. 495 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that the Principal Sudder Ameen had power to do what he did. Whether he raised a right issue, with reference to the alleged adjustment or not, it is clear that he required the…

In Re: Khaja Shurwar Hossein Khan and Others

Calcutta High Court Miscellaneous Regular Appeal No. 710 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThe two questions which have been propounded for the decision of the Full Bench are:--(reads). We are of opinion that both these questions must be answered in the affirmative. By the g…

In Re: Radha Binode Misser

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that the Court has the power, and should exercise its discretion in each particular case. The case will go back to the Court which referred it, in order that it may decide whe…

Mussamut Emambandee Begum Vs Ajoodhia Persad

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2609 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashAs we understand the proposition for which the vakeel for the special appellant has contended, it is this, that if a jote, which, so long as no right of occupancy existed in it, was no…

Ranee Surnomoyee Vs Luchmeeput Doogur and Others

Calcutta High Court No. 888 of 1867 connected with Special Appeal No. 336 of 1866

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J., Loch, Norman, Kemp, Macpherson and Markby, JJ.@mdashWhen this rule was moved for I expressed my views at length, not as binding upon me, in case I should be satisfied upon argument that I …

Sreeputty Roy Vs Loharam Roy and Others

Calcutta High Court

Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashAccording to the case stated by the Judge, a suit was brought against twenty-three defendants (of whom the present plaintiff was one) for having wrongfully constructed a bandel and cau…