Found 0 result
Showing 1159301- 1159310 of 0 result for ""
Bayley, J.@mdashI am of opinion that this rule ought to be discharged with costs. The application to this Court was to exercise its extraordinary powers u/s 15 of the Charter Act, with a view to set aside certain procee…
Bayley, J.@mdashThis is an application to set aside an order of the Principal Sudder Ameen of Hooghly, by which the Maharajah of Burdwan, as a decree-holder, was prohibited from sharing in certain sale proceeds in Court…
Glover, J.@mdashIt appears to us that the objection taken by the special appellant in this case must succeed. It has been oftentimes ruled by Division Benches of this Court that, when a Court of Appeal reverses the orde…
Loch, J.@mdashThe facts of this case are shortly as follows:--Tufani Sing, the father of the present plaintiffs and of three other sons, Trilochan Sing, Ranjit Sing, and Mannu Sing, was dismissed from his office of ghat…
Kemp, J.@mdashIn these two special appeals, the same parties were plaintiffs and defendants in the Court below.--The Judge has given the plaintiff a decree, in confirmation of the decree of the first Court. One point ta…
1. This is an appeal in a mortgage suit instituted more than twenty years ago. The original plaintiffs, the mortgagors, named Sing, sued in the Court of the Sudder Ameen of Zilla Sarun, the representatives of the origin…
1. The question raised on these appeals is whether the respondents (being plaintiffs in two different suits) have established, as against the appellant, their right to enhance the rent payable by him in respect of 134 b…
L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThis was a suit, on the part of the Land Mortgage Bank, as described in both the lower Courts, for the establishment of a putni right, that is as I take it, for a declaration of the plaintiffs'' pu…
Bayley, J.@mdashOn this special appeal coming on for hearing, the special respondent took an objection u/s 348, Act VIII of 1859, that the suit being one for damages of an amount below 500 rupees, and, therefore, cogniz…