In Re: Banka Bihari Ghose
Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that the order of the Magistrate dated the 16th of July 1868, and the warrant issued thereon ought to be set aside. The petitioner, against whom the warrant was issued, was th…
Found 0 result
Showing 1159311- 1159320 of 0 result for ""
Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashWe think that the order of the Magistrate dated the 16th of July 1868, and the warrant issued thereon ought to be set aside. The petitioner, against whom the warrant was issued, was th…
Glover, J.@mdashThis was a suit for execution of a decree. The first application the only one we have to deal with, is dated the 13th August 1964. The present application for execution was taken out on the 4th July 1867…
Norman, J.@mdashThis was a suit for a kabuliat. The plaintiff alleged that the portion of the land occupied by the indigo factory of Messrs. Robert Watson and Company, included within specific boundaries given at the fo…
Sir Barnes Peacock, Kt., C.J.@mdashThis is a very clear case. In this case a suit was brought against several defendants to recover possession of land. One of the defendants stated that he had nothing to do with the lan…
Bayley, J.@mdashThe real contention in this special appeal is that whereas a Civil Court has already decreed the lands, the rents of which form the subject of the plaintiff''s suit, to the intervenor, the plaintiff coul…
Norman, J.@mdashThis is a suit to recover a sum of 1,451 rupees paid as a deposit by the plaintiff in Bhadra 1270 (August, September 1863) to Prasanna Nath Dutt, the husband of the defendant, as part of the purchase-mon…
Markby, J.@mdashIn this case the facts appear to be that one Thakur Das Roy received a decree, in the Sealdah Small Cause Court, on the 21st February 1866, for Rs. 160, against one Ishan Chandra Chatterjee. Being desiro…
Kemp, J.@mdashThis was a suit for rent. The plaintiff, as mokurruridar, sued the ticcadar for rent. The special appellant, who alleges that he has purchased the proprietary rights in the estate, intervened u/s 77 of Act…
Loch, J.@mdashThis suit has been brought for arrears of rent for 1271, 1272 and 1273 (1864, 1865 and 1866). It appears that the defendant executed a kabuliat in favour of the plaintiffs, agreeing to pay rent at the rate…
Kemp, J.@mdashTwo points are taken in special appeal, first that the lower Appellate Court has misconstrued a petition filed by the plaintiff, dated the 5th of September 1859; and, secondly, that, under the Mitakshara l…