Latest Judgements

Search & filter over 1,159,701 results

Filters

Reset filters

Found 0 result

Showing 1159321- 1159330 of 0 result for ""

Updated just now

Gopal Sing Vs Kanhya Lal Sahebzada and Another

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2002 of 1868

Kemp, J.@mdashThis was a suit, on the part of the plaintiff, for possession, by right of inheritance, of certain properties left by his maternal grandfather, Dindayal. There are two sets of defendants in this case, the …

Jakriram Bhakat Vs Shahzada Pakaktar Alias Kahnu Sahib

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 2466 of 1868

Loch, J.@mdashThe lower Courts have held that the defendant, when duly summoned to appear, failed to attend without lawful excuse. We think that this Court cannot interfere with this finding. But it is urged, in the sec…

Sarbamangala Debi Vs Srinath Gangopadhya and Others

Calcutta High Court Regular Appeals Nos. 8 and 15

E. Jackson, J.@mdashBoth these appeals are from the decision of the Principal Sudder Ameen of Rungpore in a suit brought by Sarbamangala Debi against Srinath Gangopadhya and others. Sarbamangala Debi sued to recover pos…

Queen Vs Tulsi Sing and Others

Calcutta High Court

Loch, J.@mdashWe concur in the opinion expressed by the Judge, and direct that the fine imposed upon Thakur Singh and his party be remitted.

Janmajay Mazumdar Vs Keshab Lal Ghose and Another

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 1239 of 1868

Macpherson, J.@mdashWe think the judgment of the lower Appellate Court is right, and this appeal ought to be dismissed. As the case is placed before us, the real contest is as to the right of succession to one Gorachand…

Thakur Mahabir Prasad Vs Shiu Dayalpuri and Another

Calcutta High Court Special Appeal No. 1808 of 1868

L.S. Jackson, J.@mdashThe plaintiff in this case alleged that he held a mokurruri tenure of the lands in dispute under the party from whom the defendant, Shin Charan had purchased, and under the defendant, Shiu Dayal; a…

Mrityunjaya Sirkar Vs Gopal Chandra Sirkar and Others

Calcutta High Court Speal Appeal No. 888 of 1868

Loch, J.@mdashWe do not concur in the Judge''s reasons for coming to the conclusion he has done, still we think his order must be affirmed. In special appeal, the plaintiff alleges that the Judge is wrong in holding tha…